I acted wrongly in this matter, though not in the precise way alleged by the Stephens; this petition is unintelligible by itself.
I have however examined the judgment of H. Phillipps (contained in App. 4, pp. 28-33, both ends of the Report of the High Court enclosed in Jour. desp. no. 265 of the 29 July last) which goes minutely with the facts & makes them Case clear.
The Complaint of Stephen prison is that he has been deprived of land on his Eastern boundary, but the fact appears to be that he has been curtailed on the Western side of his allotment; & that Govt ought not to have issued a proclamation boundary, having been led into that error by their anxiety to widen Wafitty Street, though they ought to have taken a position against it before.
I don't think that he has moral ground of complaint in reference to his Eastern Boundary land.
I do not feel sure that...
i
acted wrongly in this matter, though not
in the precise way alleged by the Stephens, this petition ignit unintelligible by itself:
I have however
examined the judgment shen H. Phillipfer
(contained in App. 4, pp. 28-33, bottes of the Report
of the Hiking
Lan
summer Enclosed in
.س
Jour desp. no. 265 of
last
the 29 Juht) which
goes muites with the facts & makes them
Case clear.
m
Complaint
Stephen prison
is that he has been deprived
}
of
thas good ground of Complaint
of land on his Easternge boundary, but the
fact appears to be that
he has been curtailed the Western side
з
his allotment:& that de
yth the Govt Kugh in 3. The fivemmen
Shough not
The precise way allywo by him –
thrid the Jufrem It has forone
the
cronsons, and
May
seem
to have issued
My.Stephen are with
to by
a
ap expneous brunday,
having been led into Las arian from
I that error by their anxing to widen Wafitty Street,
though de propitly have ostyal pos Coman pastion agt tufore,
Jianshent think
that he has morall
ground of complaint in reference,
win & the
A
Easters Boundary s
land.
mogennot feel sure 4. I do not
that
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.